|
WASHINGTON --
At an awards
ceremony last month in Washington, D.C., national consumer and health organizations selected some of the "most misleading, unfair, and irresponsible" ad campaigns of the past year for the 13th annual Harlan Page Hubbard Lemon Awards.
The not-so-thrilled winning advertisers were notified that they were each entitled to a "Hubbard" -- a bronze-colored victory statuette grasping a fresh lemon. The "winners" included:
| |
|
The awards ceremony
was conducted in Oscar-like fashion at the National Press Club on Dec. 4 with formal-attired attendants opening sealed award envelopes and presenting lemon-topped trophies. The Hubbard Awards are named after the 19th-century advertising impresario who pioneered the use of deceptive advertising techniques on a national scale. One of Hubbard's biggest campaigns was for "Lydia Pinkham's Vegetable Compound," an elixir that Hubbard advertised as a "cure" for disorders ranging from cancer to low sex drive.
"The Hubbard spirit is alive and well in the advertising community today. Whether it's a long distance telephone company that promises 'free' phone calls or a diet program that promises weight loss 'without the risks,' deceptive ads empty our pocketbooks and endanger our health," Silverglade said. Hubbard lemon trophies were also awarded to:
Some previous Hubbard Award winners have been clobbered with substantial penalties. For example, advertising for Arthritis Foundation Pain Relievers, manufactured by a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson, received a Hubbard Award in 1994 for implying that the line of non-prescription pain relievers were new products especially designed for the relief of arthritis when they actually consisted of ordinary aspirin, ibuprofen, and other commonly-available non-prescription pain relievers. In October 1996, a coalition of 19 state attorneys general forced the company to halt the ads and pay almost $2 million in penalties. The Federal Trade Commission and 23 state attorneys general also took action against Mitsubishi, a 1995 winner, for misleading auto leasing commercials (the monthly lease payment was splashed across the television screen in large type, but other mandatory costs were buried in tiny type that appeared at the bottom of the screen for only a few seconds). "We are gratified that the Hubbard Awards are being taken seriously. Unfortunately, federal agencies like the FTC need more authority for combating deceptive advertising. As long as the FTC is under funded and it's authority remains limited, consumers themselves must remain vigilant," said Brian Branton, a legislative associate at CSPI and co-organizer of the event. |
Albion Monitor January 26, 1998 (http://www.monitor.net/monitor)
All Rights Reserved.
Contact rights@monitor.net for permission to reproduce.