Yet it is also true that the events of recent days have exposed weaknesses in the Clinton campaign. There may be no sense of panic in her headquarters -- and there is almost certainly no nefarious strategy of demonizing Obama, her leading rival -- but the clumsiness of her surrogates and staffers has made her campaign look panicky and scheming at once. At the very least, their blunders have provided ample ammunition for cheap shots.
It is hard to imagine that the Clinton campaign conspired with Bill Shaheen to introduce the subject of Obama's youthful drug use, or urged Bob Kerrey to blather on about the Sen.'s middle name and Muslim heritage. It is much more likely that both men were simply opening their mouths without thinking too hard about the consequences, which is to say, simply being themselves.
Expecting Clinton to control every blurted stupidity of her supporters is unfair.
But digging up an Obama kindergarten essay about his presidential aspirations was plain dumb, even if he started the silly exchange over who is more ambitious. That may have been the work of an overzealous junior researcher. Sending senior strategist Mark Penn to defend her on CNBC's "Hardball," however, was a bad decision made at the highest level. A controversial figure because of his unsavory public relations clientele, Penn proved to be neither prepossessing nor nimble. He only worsened the damage done by Shaheen's remarks when he uttered the word "cocaine," and then allowed himself to be drawn into a shrill debate over what he had just said.
The tin-eared Penn may not fully understand the potential consequences of that exchange -- which has been televized again and again -- but the Clintons surely should. To the black Americans who have long been their most loyal supporters, that cocaine reference carries an unmistakable tinge of racial politics, which must be avoided in this contest for both moral and strategic reasons.
All these ugly, petty controversies have distracted Clinton from pointing up her differences with Obama in approaching Social Security and national health insurance, which offered a clean, clear way to deter his challenge. Instead, she is apologizing and explaining.
Surprisingly, the disputes that have lately monopolized so much news coverage and commentary have not dented her national appeal significantly. Although Clinton faces difficulties in Iowa and New Hampshire, the latest USA Today/Gallup Poll shows that she has started to recover the commanding lead that began to diminish in late November, after her poor debate performance.
Conducted over the weekend of Dec. 14-16, the Gallup survey shows Clinton gaining six points and moving up from 39 percent two weeks earlier to 45 percent among registered Democratic voters. Obama moved up as well by three points in that poll from 24 percent to 27 percent, leaving him still 18 points behind the front-runner. Support for Edwards and the rest of the Democratic field remained essentially the same.
Consistent with those numbers are other polls indicating that Clinton's troubles in Iowa and New Hampshire have not surfaced so far in the big states, whose primaries will determine the ultimate winner.
She has been slowed, but not stopped -- and she should not be underestimated.
© Creators Syndicate
Comments? Send a letter to the editor.
Albion Monitor December
22, 2007 (http://www.albionmonitor.com)
All Rights Reserved.
Contact email@example.com for permission to use in any format.