|
While there is indeed little doubt that his new status as a Nobel Peace Laureate will further enhance Gore's stature and electability, most political analysts, including members of Gore's inner circle, consider it highly unlikely that he will throw his hat into the ring.
"Vice President Gore truly appreciates the sentiment and the feeling behind the ad," said Gore's official spokesperson, Kalee Kreider. "But as a private citizen his efforts are going behind a campaign of a different kind. The vast majority of his energy right now is going into educating people about the climate crisis and trying to get that issue to a tipping point."
Indeed, aside from his distinction as being the most prominent Democrat to loudly warn against Congressional approval of a 2002 resolution giving President George W. Bush authority to take military action against Iraq, climate change has been the signature issue of the former vice president since his controversial defeat by Bush in the 2000 elections.
In fact, Gore's focus on the environment and global warming goes back at least to the publication of his first book, "Earth in the Balance," in 1992, when he was still serving as a U.S. senator on the eve of the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro. The attention gained by both the summit and the book helped persuade Bill Clinton to name Gore as his running-mate in the elections later that year.
Since the 2000 election, in which Gore won the popular vote only to lose as a result of a highly controversial split decision by the Supreme Court, Gore has campaigned aggressively -- from quietly rallying with Christian evangelical leaders to break with the Christian Right over climate change to producing and starring in an Oscar-winning documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth" -- to put global warming at the top of the international public agenda.
Now that those efforts have been rewarded with a Nobel Prize, it would indeed seem an opportune moment for Gore to enter the presidential race as Carter and many environmental and Democratic activists -- especially those who are dissatisfied with the current field and Sen. Hillary Clinton's widening lead -- are urging.
Nonetheless, most analysts believe he is unlikely to jump in.
As Kreider herself noted, Gore may indeed feel that he can accomplish more outside of government and as a leader of a movement than as a politician who will be forced to deal with a whole range of issues on which he will inevitably have to make difficult compromises that can only tarnish his image as a crusader.
"This clearly will help this [climate] campaign [become] even larger, and he'll have an even louder voice," Donna Brazile, Gore's 2000 campaign manager, told AP Friday. "But for now he's citizen Al Gore, and I think he's comfortable being citizen Al Gore."
More practical challenges also tend to weigh against a run, not the least having to raise money and build a nationwide organization from scratch, when the three top-tier candidates -- Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama, and former Sen. John Edwards -- already have tens of millions of dollars and well-oiled campaign machinery at their disposal.
A number of key Democratic funders opposed to Clinton approached Gore about running in late 2006 but became deeply frustrated by his apparent lack of interest, according to one informed source who asked not to be identified. "Those who would be most able to help him now have been turned off," the source said.
Moreover, the growing conviction among political pros that Clinton, whose steadily growing lead in both money-raising and the polls, has all but wrapped up the Democratic nomination, if not next November's general election, also works against a Gore bid.
"If he challenged her at this point," said Stephen Clemons of the New America Foundation, "he knows he risks losing Hillary's support for crucial climate change initiatives if she becomes president. The fact that he owns the global climate change franchise will already make it difficult for the Clinton political franchise to find compelling reasons to adopt the issue as its own. It's a delicate relationship."
One Washington veteran noted that the Nobel itself is unlikely to have any lasting effect on the presidential race beyond from the latest surge of speculation.
"I'd love it if it shook up the race," said William Goodfellow, the long-time director of the Center for International Policy here. "But for most Americans, the Oscar is a bigger deal than the Nobel. A lot of people think Gore is an elitist and the Nobel unfortunately won't help that image."
Comments? Send a letter to the editor.Albion Monitor October
12, 2007 (http://www.albionmonitor.com) All Rights Reserved. Contact rights@monitor.net for permission to use in any format. |