|
Robertson blames Me for retribution but not for conflicts. He blames
Sharon for parsing out the Holy Land but not Me for letting him divide
it. He blames Me for the stroke of an obese, stress-laden,
77-year-old prime minister but not for terminal cancer in
children. He blames the stroke on My penchant for punishing evil, yet not
a word for My pardoning Nixon. He celebrates My guidance in ousting
Saddam and his regime's crimes against humanity, yet ignores My
neglecting Sudan.
In the least, Robertson is cherry-picking. At worst, he's not read the
Ten Commandments -- especially the My-name-in-vain part. At first I
thought that one might read a bit too narcissistic, but I never thought
people would think it concerned petty outbursts of blasphemy. For My
Son's sake, I created so-called blaspheme words as a calming device. I
figured, if I were going to let you hit your finger with a hammer, it was
My responsibility to let you vent. The name-in-vain part was meant for
real blaspheme -- the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, Jihad, slavery,
and any sentence that begins with, "It's my God-given right to...." It
wasn't meant for blaming suicidal piloting into buildings on gays --
which I understand I was supposed to have endorsed because I believe
homosexuality to be sinful. I don't want to go Nathan Lane all over you,
but if homosexuality were sinful, explain why I let Brokeback Mountain
sweep this year's Oscars? Oops. A little bit too much information.
For years, Robertson and his colleagues have been using My name to wage
their own Holy War on anything they disagree with. (Holy War. I've always
been bothered by the placing those two words together. If I had as much
forethought as I'm given credit for -- and more room on those tablets --
I would have made a Commandment to cover that one).
Robertson says I know longer care about Dover, PA because of their
refusal to allow Intelligent Design in their science classes. If there
truly were Intelligent Design, why would I have designed Robertson?
Robertson's convictions seem to impose on Me the defect of bad timing. If
I punish those who do evil, why do I often wait so long and allow so many
years of pain to be inflicted before I apply punishment? Why wouldn't I
have stepped in and purged the world of Hitler while his only atrocities
were afflicted on the walls he painted? Why would I have allowed the
families of those 12 miners believe their loved ones had survived? Why
would I have permitted Rob Schneider to make so many movies? Why would I
condone Bill O'Reilly?
Fault Me for splinters. That I can understand. A little reminder that you
should be more careful. But punishing people with strokes? That's a
bit heady, isn't it?
If Robertson's rationalization is that I gave free-will and it's up to
humans to do with it as they please, wouldn't that make me an accessory
to any crime. If there's Intelligent Design, wasn't Mr. Sharon designed by
Me?
This is not to discount Mr. Robertson's right to say or think what he
wishes, I just wish he would take responsibility and stop blaming his
idiotic and hateful statements on Me.
Love,
G
P.S. For those who might still want to believe in ID, for creating the
countless series of events countless numbers of years that to lead up to
Mr. Robertson's birth, I apologize.
Steve Young, author of "Great Failures of the Extremely Successful" can be read every Sunday in the LA Daily News Op-Ed page (right next to Bill O'Reilly)
Comments? Send a letter to the editor.Albion Monitor
January 7, 2006 (http://www.albionmonitor.com)All Rights Reserved. Contact rights@monitor.net for permission to use in any format. |
|