include("../../art/protect.inc") ?>
by Brian Smith |
|
My watch
wasn't the only one that beeped at 7:00 sharp. Others in the
audience for the Project Inform World AIDS Conference Report knew what time
it was -- cocktail hour. We dutifully reached for our water bottles and, in
my case, an evening Combivir. We sat at ground zero, inside a cavernous
lecture hall at the University of California, San Francisco attending the
first regional town meeting Project Inform will hold to report on this
year's AIDS conference in Geneva. For me, it was also a bittersweet
homecoming -- to the same teaching hospital where, 13 years before, doctors
explained that my hemophilia medicine was infected with HIV.
I don't normally get that involved with cutting edge reports from the HIV scientific front lines. If my treatment is working, I am happy to leave the details to the experts. But the mainstream press from this year's AIDS convention in Geneva was downright disturbing. Who can forget headlines screaming: "AIDS Discovery Worries Scientists - Man infected with drug-resistant strain of HIV;" "Warnings From World AIDS Meeting;" "Poor Nations Losing Battle Against AIDS." Since Project Inform fields over 40,000 hotline calls a year from across the nation, I figured they could cut through the hype. Between PI's Founding Director, Martin Delaney and the questions of the treatment-ese fluent San Francisco crowd, I learned that things are neither as bad or as good as we had been told by the media. Most of the recent coverage on the status of AIDS and HIV research has overplayed findings, latched onto peripheral issues, or published pharmaceutical press hype before checking with the experts. For my money, I'll go with what I learned that night over any big newspaper version.
|
|
First, the dispute between developed and under-developed nations is still very real. The conference title, 'Bridging the Gap,' seems ironic to Martin Delaney, who commented, "What this conference actually did was emphasize how wide that gap has become between what we have here in the United States and how 90 percent of the world is trying to deal with AIDS." Treatment discussions throughout the conference constantly stumbled over the block of world economic disparity. Such disparity was chillingly brought home to conference participants in Geneva, in the form of ostentatious displays of wealth by the drug companies. "For the doctors from poor nations, the dinners, the shows and the food being sponsored by these companies was insulting and they became angry," said Delaney. "Something needs to be done about this before the next conference, which will be held in Africa. The pharmaceutical companies cannot behave this way again."
|
|
As AIDS continues to ravage the Third World, combination therapy remains financially out of reach for most countries. There was some talk of a UNAIDS initiative to work with drug companies, but there was no consensus. Some advocates believe prevention should be the priority in countries where even preventable diseases like TB and malaria are still a major killers. On the research front, Delaney said, "The one picture that is so clear from the conference is the need for a vaccine. We are never going to be able, in my view, to deliver therapy as we know it, to the hardest hit places on this planet for HIV disease. As activists, we need to focus more attention on vaccine development programs." Back in the First World, evidence is accumulating of long-term side effects for some people using combination therapies currently on the market. This conference also confirmed long-held scientific theories on transmission of resistant virus. A report was presented in which a newly infected, untreated man was already resistant to most AIDS drugs. Meanwhile, the two-to-three year pipeline for new drugs looks weak. In the developed countries, HIV infections continue to punish communities of color, the poor and IV drug users. Prevention programs are still woefully under-funded worldwide and despite scientific proof of its value, needle exchange funding faces an uphill battle in the U.S., after being dragged into politics.
|
|
In the labs, the new super-sensitive viral load tests are now widely available in the U.S. and patients should ask for them. Undetectable viral loads under the new test are significantly lower than previous measure down to 500 copies. According to Delaney, "If you are below the 50 level on the new test there is a big difference in how long the virus is going to stay suppressed than under 500 on the old test." Many studies delivered at the conference found creative and effective new drug combinations. People who have developed resistance to an older drug combination and those just starting a treatment should be able to access these regimes soon. There is no evidence, however, that suggests it's smart to switch from your current treatment if it is working well and you are not having debilitating side effects. According to Delaney, a reporter on the East Coast surveyed the nation's clinics and found 10 people who, under medical supervision, have gone off therapy and gone six months or more without a return of replicating virus. The virus however, was not eliminated entirely. These studies suggest remission without eradication may be possible. "The debate has now become -- can people live a normal lifetime with these reduced levels and not see an aggressive return of measurable viral loads," said Delaney. On a final hopeful note, a team from France found CD4 counts rising steadily and without plateau in patients who responded well to drugs and kept a strict regime. This suggests the immune system may be able to rebuild itself over time. As I left this year's Town Meeting in San Francisco, my head spun with information and numbers. I had the feeling of surviving an organic chemistry lecture in college. The presentation was concise, informative, and empowering -- not surprising for an annual road show now in its second decade. Walking through the nightime summer fog to the bus stop, I was most struck by the Third World situation. Beyond questions of how to save as many people as possible, I wondered who will buy a billion beeping watches?
Albion Monitor August 3, 1998 (http://www.monitor.net/monitor)
All Rights Reserved.
Contact rights@monitor.net for permission to use in any format.
|